[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Maarten buis <maartenbuis@yahoo.co.uk> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: mlogit and mfx -- statistical significance |

Date |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:26:27 +0000 (GMT) |

The reason for such a difference is that there is a subtle difference in what these two measures measure: The output from -mlogit- gives you a test whether the odds ratio (*) is significantly different from 1, while -mfx- gives you a change in probabilities. Say the odds ratio is 10, but the baseline odds is .0001 success for every failure, so we are talking about comparing a odds of .0001 with an odds of .001, which corresponds to a probabilities .00009999 and .000999, leading to a risk difference (result of -mfx-) of .00089901 . So a big sounding odds ratio of 10 can easily correspond to a very small sounding risk difference of .0009 . The reason is that by computing the ratio of odds, the baseline odds drops out, so whith odds ratios you only look groups are different but leave out the fact that those differences hardly matter if probability of success is very high or very low for everybody. Hope this helps, Maarten (*) Some disciplines don't call the parameters of -mlogit- log odds ratios, but they are the log of a ratio of odds, so I think the other disciplines are correct in refering to them as log odds ratios, for more on this see: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2007-02/msg00085.html Ps. has anybody noticed that I have refrained from repeating my favourite feature request? --- David Zetland <dzetland@gmail.com> wrote: > Can anyone explain why some RHS vars are significant in <mlogit> but > not in <mfx> (and vice versa)? > > I have several RHS dummies, but the problem also shows up with > <margeff> > > Should I care? What can be done about it? How do I interpret results? > > I have searched the FAQs and forums and seen similar questions but no > answers > > -- > The measure of a man is what he does with power. -- Plato > > David Zetland (http://ssrn.com/author=354433) 530-848-9208 > PhD Candidate, Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Davis > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html > * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > ----------------------------------------- Maarten L. Buis Department of Social Research Methodology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Boelelaan 1081 1081 HV Amsterdam The Netherlands visiting address: Buitenveldertselaan 3 (Metropolitan), room Z434 +31 20 5986715 http://home.fsw.vu.nl/m.buis/ ----------------------------------------- __________________________________________________________ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. More Ways to Keep in Touch. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: mlogit and mfx -- statistical significance***From:*David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu>

**References**:**st: mlogit and mfx -- statistical significance***From:*"David Zetland" <dzetland@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: decimal points/format using outsum command** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Re: Mata question** - Previous by thread:
**st: mlogit and mfx -- statistical significance** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: mlogit and mfx -- statistical significance** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |