[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: question on heckman

Subject   st: question on heckman
Date   Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:38:07 -0500 (EST)

I have a question on Mill's ratio and Heckman procedure. When I use Mill
ratio to take into account the possible endogeneity of one of my
explanatory variable, I get different result from what I get by using
regular IV. What can be the resaon (reasons) for that? The more basic
question is that what distinguishes using Mill ratio and regular IV?
I appreciate your help

*   For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index