[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu, statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Differences in regression slopes |

Date |
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:17:23 -0500 |

At 12:14 PM 2/20/2008, E. Paul Wileyto wrote:

Responses so far have sent you this way and that. Just look up -test- in STATA help.Without going into all the gory details, in logit and probit models such comparisons have much the same problem as you have in OLS if you try to compare standardized coefficients across groups. In OLS, the problem with comparing standardized coefficients is that, unless the means and standard deviations of variables are the same across populations, the variables will get standardized differently across populations (e.g. in one population the variable gets divided by 3 while in the other it gets divided by 4) so the coefficients are not comparable.

To get to the point of using -test- for your purpose, you would need to specify a model that has group-specific slopes, or combine two regressions, one for each group, using -suest-.

Paul

In logit and probit models, the coefficients are inherently standardized, albeit in a different way. In order to identify the coefficients, in a logit model, the residual variance is typically fixed at pi^2/3, or about 3.29. In probit, the residual variance is typically fixed at one. BUT, if residual variability differs across populations, the coefficients in the two populations get standardized differently and hence are not directly comparable.

For a much more detailed and probably clearer discussion, see

Allison, Paul. 1999. "Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups." Sociological Methods and Research 28(2): 186-208.

Incidentally, a little exercise I use to help my students see this: Run a logit model. Then run Long and Freese's -fitstat- command. The error variance will be reported as 3.29. Now, add some variables to the model. Or, if you prefer, drop some variables. Or, just use entirely different variables. No matter what you do, the error variance is always 3.29. It is very different from the way we are used to seeing things in OLS.

-------------------------------------------

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology

OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463

HOME: (574)289-5227

EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu

WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: Differences in regression slopes***From:*"Lachenbruch, Peter" <Peter.Lachenbruch@oregonstate.edu>

**References**:**st: Differences in regression slopes***From:*"Barth Riley" <BarthRiley@comcast.net>

**Re: st: Differences in regression slopes***From:*"E. Paul Wileyto" <epw@mail.med.upenn.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Differences in regression slopes** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Installing v10, then v9** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Differences in regression slopes** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Differences in regression slopes** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |