Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: different results using mifit and mim procedures


From   "Malinda Kennedy" <mhkenned@hsph.harvard.edu>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: different results using mifit and mim procedures
Date   Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:11:54 -0500

Dear Stata users,
I originally did an analysis on a dataset with multiple imputations using an older version of stata and used mifit. I recently upgraded to Stata 10 and am redoing the analysis using the mim procedure.  I am concerned because I am getting slightly different results. Does anyone know why the results would be different and if one set of results is better to report than the other?

example: OR(95% CI) using mifit: 1.31 (1.14-1.50)
                                 using mim: 1.45 (1.13-1.84)


Many thanks,

Malinda


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index