[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Newson, Roger B" <r.newson@imperial.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles |

Date |
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:16:21 -0000 |

Sorry, -estaou- should have been -estout- (Ben Jann's SSC package). Roger Roger B Newson Lecturer in Medical Statistics Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London Royal Brompton campus Room 33, Emmanuel Kaye Building 1B Manresa Road London SW3 6LR UNITED KINGDOM Tel: +44 (0)20 7352 8121 ext 3381 Fax: +44 (0)20 7351 8322 Email: r.newson@imperial.ac.uk Web page: www.imperial.ac.uk/nhli/r.newson/ Departmental Web page: http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/about/divisions/nhli/respiration/popgenetics/reph/ Opinions expressed are those of the author, not of the institution. -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Newson, Roger B Sent: 14 February 2008 16:09 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles I don't use -outreg2- myself )because I use -parmest-). However, my personal view re formatting of P-value is that they should be reported to a given number of significant figures, rather than to a given number of decimal places. This is because (contrary to popular belief) P-values below 0.0005 are NOT "as good as zero", because today's genome-scan chips can measure a million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and today's computers can measure the associations of all of these polymorphisms with a disease, and over 1/2000 of these associations (on average) will be statistically significant at P<=0.0005, even if all associations are zero in the population at large. Therefore, it matters whether an individual P-value is 0.0005 or 0.00000005. The ideal Stata format to use for P-values is probably %-8.1e, ie left-justified, with a width of 8, presented in scientific notation as x.ye-z, where x and y are digits, and z is a possibly multi-digit integer, which, in practice, will not have more than 3 digits, even on today's computers (I think). However, as a lot of readers are more accustomed to P-values of 0.05 than to P-values of 5.0e-2, we might compromise with these readers by choosing a format of %-8.1g, which should give the familiar multi-digit decimal format for P-values down to, and including, 1.0e-5. I would be surprised if -outreg- and/or -outreg2- and/or -estaou- did not have the ability to format P-values in either of these ways. (Or in a format such as %8.3f, if readers ostinately prefer decimal-place formats.) The -parmest- package has a -format()- option for this purpose. I hope this helps. Best wishes Roger Roger B Newson Lecturer in Medical Statistics Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London Royal Brompton campus Room 33, Emmanuel Kaye Building 1B Manresa Road London SW3 6LR UNITED KINGDOM Tel: +44 (0)20 7352 8121 ext 3381 Fax: +44 (0)20 7351 8322 Email: r.newson@imperial.ac.uk Web page: www.imperial.ac.uk/nhli/r.newson/ Departmental Web page: http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/about/divisions/nhli/respiration/popgenetics/reph/ Opinions expressed are those of the author, not of the institution. -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of John Bunge Sent: 14 February 2008 15:23 To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles Dear all, I am using outreg2 with the 'pvalue' option (p-values of t-statistics instead of standard errors are reported). I tried to limit the number of deciles of the p-values to 3 with the 'tdec(integer)' option but it did not work. For some coefficients, it reports me 8 deciles (like e.g. 0.00000071) which futilely blows up the width of the table columns. Instead of this space-consuming number I'd prefer a simple 0.000. Any helpful suggestions are highly appreciated. Best, John. _______________________________________________________________________ Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220 * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles***From:*John Bunge <jota.be@web.de>

**st: RE: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles***From:*"Newson, Roger B" <r.newson@imperial.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Stata Technical Bulletin** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: problem with outreg2: p-value deciles** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: AW: Error in -esttab- (option smcltags not allowed)** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |