[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
jpitblado@stata.com (Jeff Pitblado, StataCorp LP) |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Can a log-likelihood evaluator program obtain the current e(V) or Hessian? |

Date |
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:48:45 -0600 |

Joseph Coveney <jcoveney@bigplanet.com> wants to add a function of the Hessian to the likelihood value: > I would like to penalize the likelihood with a function of the negative > Hessian. How can I have the evaluator program for use with ml method -lf- > see the most recent Hessian during each iteration? I know that -ml > maximize- has it available somewhere, because -ml maximize, hessian- reports > it during iterations. But a log-likelihood evaluator program (one called > by -ml model lf-) cannot simply put -matrix `penalty' = some function of > syminv(e(V))-, because -ml maximize- doesn't post it or update it until the > end of the run. > > I've tried > > ml model lf , , , > ml maximize, iterate(1) > local not_yet 1 > while (`not_yet') { > matrix define B = e(b) > ml model lf . . . > ml init B > ml maximize, search(off) iterate(1) nooutput > local not_yet = cond(e(converged), 0, `not_yet') > } > ml display > > but there are at least two iterations (zero and one) for each call to -ml > maximize , iterate(1)-, each iteration calling the likelihood evaluator > several times, and e(V) doesn't get updated within the -ml maximize- call > before the convergence criterion is met. I believe this will require a change to Joseph's likelihood evaluator in addition to the following changes to his example above. tempname penalty nH ll1 ll2 rd local tol = 1e-6 scalar `penalty' = 0 global MY_penalty `penalty' ml model lf ... ml maximize, nooutput noclear scalar `ll1' = e(ll) local not_yet 1 while (`not_yet') { matrix `nH' = syminv(e(V)) scalar `penalty' = ... function of `nH' ... ml maximize, search(off) noclear nooutput scalar `ll2' = e(ll) scalar `rd' = reldif(`ll1', `ll2') local not_yet = `rd' > `tol' } ml max, search(off) Now all we need to do is change the likelihood evaluator to recognize whether $MY_penalty is defined and add it to the log likelihood calculation. program mylfeval args lnf ... ... if "$ML_penalty" != "" { quietly replace `lnf' = `lnf' + $ML_penalty } end If we want the penalty to be added to the overall likelihood only once, then we would code the value in $ML_penalty to be equal to the average penalty over the estimation sample. Technical note: Adding a function of the Hessian as a penalty to the likelihood calculation would invalidate the type 'lf' evaluators numerical assumptions. I believe -ml model lf- would have a hard time computing the numerical derivatives for something like this. Notice that the standard errors from the above solution do not take the penalty into account. Thus the above is only useful to Joseph if he doesn't care about the penalty's influence on the standard errors. Otherwise we have a chicken and egg problem. The Hessian is a function of the log likelihood, but we want the log likelihood calculation to be a function of the Hessian. If we were to fix the penalty to only be a function of the unpenalized log-likelihood function, then we would be able to get the adjusted standard errors if we could write down the functional form of the penalized likelihood. This would most likely require a type 'd0' evaluator, since the penalty invalidates the type 'lf' numerical assumptions. --Jeff jpitblado@stata.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: Re: Controlling display format for -addlabel- option on -histogram-** - Next by Date:
**st: xtreg with constraints?** - Previous by thread:
**st: Can a log-likelihood evaluator program obtain the current e(V) or Hessian?** - Next by thread:
**st: xtserial** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |