Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Binomial regression


From   Marcello Pagano <pagano@hsph.harvard.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Binomial regression
Date   Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:27:55 -0400

Convenience should not be the determining factor, rather which model best fits the data should be what governs our choices.

m.p.

Tim Wade wrote:

Thanks Constantine for sharing your results.

There are certainly cases where the risk difference is a more
appropriate or desirable measure. In these cases, the identity link
does have the significant advantage of being linear on the probability
scale instead of the log odds scale. And while we can convert log-odds
to probability, it is often convenient, especially when we have a
multivariate model to be able to interpret the regression coefficients
as the expected change in the probability (i.e, the risk difference)
holding other factors constant. Since probability is not linear in the
logistic model, similar inferences about probability or risk
differences cannot be made with the logistic model. If one wants to
make a statement about risk differences from multivariate logistic
model, it needs to be with regard to holding the other covariates at
some specific constant value, such as zero or at their mean values.

Tim

On 8/2/07, Marcello Pagano <pagano@hsph.harvard.edu> wrote:

Sorry to disagree with your first sentence, Constantine.
Logistic regression stipulates a linear relationship of covariates with
the log of the odds of an event (not odds ratios).
From this it is straightforward to recover the probability (or risk, if
you prefer that label) of the event.
Don't understand your aversion to logistic regression to achieve what
you want to achieve.
If you don't like the shape of the logistic, then any other cdf will
provide you with a transformation to obey the constraints inherent in
modeling a probability. The uniform distribution that you wish to use
has to be curtailed, as others have pointed out.
m.p.


Constantine Daskalakis wrote:

No argument about logistic regression. But that gives you odds ratios.
What if you want risk differences instead?

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index