[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
RE: st: Unbalanced panel, count number of incidents |

Date |
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:59:54 +0100 |

I don't see how Naomi's solution gets at the most difficult part of this problem, which is to take account of the irregularity of times observed in counting over the last # days. -egen, count()-, or even -egen, total()- which is a better bet for similar problems, is more or less useless for this kind of problem as the relevant time interval varies. I too am probably missing something simple. However, when all inspiration fails, try brute force. The brute force approach is quite easy to program and at worst requires a single loop over the observations. An approach discussed at length in Cox, N.J. 2007. Making it count. Stata Journal 7(1) is to set up a variable, loop over possibilities using -count- for each observation, and replace each value of that variable by the result. This is built into the following program: *! 1.0.0 NJC 22 July 2007 program count_recent version 8 syntax [if] [in], Lag(numlist int max=1 >0) Generate(str) quietly { confirm new var `generate' marksample touse count if `touse' if r(N) == 0 error 2000 tsset local p "`r(panelvar)'" local t "`r(timevar)'" if "`p'" == "" { tempvar p gen byte `p' = 1 } gen `generate' = . forval i = 1/`=_N' { if `touse'[`i'] { count if `touse' /// & inrange(`t'[`i'] - `t', 1, `lag') /// & `p' == `p'[`i'] replace `generate' = r(N) in `i' } } } end What we are counting, for each observation, are how many observations are (c) in the same panel (whenever there is panel structure) -- you don't quite say this is what you want, but I guess it's true. (b) within 1 to -lag- (compulsory option) time units previous (a) relevant (by default all observations). This is determined by any -if- or -in- conditions. I assume a prior -tsset-. So, examples could be tsset ID Date count_recent , lag(30) generate(prev30) count_recent if Response == 1, lag(60) generate(pos_prev60) Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk Naomi Levy > I am no expert here, and there is likely to be a much > easier way to do this than what I am suggesting, but this is what I > would do: > > I would -reshape- your data from long form to wide > form so that each row is an ID and the responses on each day > of contact > become separate variables. > > The new form would look like this: > > ID Response37200 Var137200 Var237200 > Response37210 Var137210 Var237210 > 1 1 1 1 > 0 2 1 > > Before > you do this I suggest dropping any variables you don't need for this > analysis and renaming variables so their names are shorter (e.g. > response to r). Also, if all you are interested in for the > analysis are more recent > dates of contact, you can drop all the data for prior dates > of contact. > > the syntax for reshape is: > reshape wide [varlist], i(id) j(date) > > once > you've done that, you can just generate a new variable that > sums across > the responses (once counting non-missing responses, and once counting > positive responses). > > after doing that, you can easily reshape the data back to long form: > reshape long [varlist], i(id) j(date) Andrew Stocking > I have an unbalanced panel of subjects who have been > contacted very > irregularly over the past 5 years. Total contacts range from > 40-250 during > the 5 year period depending on the person. I'd like to create two > variables: one that counts the total number of contacts in > the last 30 or 60 > days and a second that sums the number of positive responses > over the same > 30 or 60 days. For each contact there could be anywhere from > 0-15 contacts > in the last 30 days. > > My data looks like: > ID Date Response Var1 Var2 > 1 37200 1 1 1 > 1 37210 0 2 1 > 1 37215 1 3 2 > 1 37229 1 4 3 > 1 37231 0 4 2 > 2 37201 0 1 0 > ..... > > I can't make egen count() work for me (or really anything else). * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**RE: st: Unbalanced panel, count number of incidents***From:*"Andrew Stocking" <astocking@earth.care2.com>

**References**:**Re: st: Unbalanced panel, count number of incidents***From:*Naomi Levy <naomi.levy@berkeley.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: Sum over all possible combinations** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: Factor analysis after multiple imputation in STATA** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Unbalanced panel, count number of incidents** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Unbalanced panel, count number of incidents** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |