Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: OUTREG2 marginal effect from biprobit???


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: OUTREG2 marginal effect from biprobit???
Date   Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:56:49 +0100

The standard Statalist convention for writing about 
commands uses patterns -cmdname- and -functionname()-. 
For example, -biprobit-. This is explained in the 
FAQ. 

There is no reason for idiosyncratic conventions, 
least of all for totally unStataish use of all capitals. 
Please note for future postings. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Nirina F

> I would like to ask you 2 questions:
> 
> 1- what is meant by the following message when running BIPROBIT:
> 
> warning: predict() expression  unsuitable for standard-error 
> calculation;
> option nose imposed
> 
> Marginal effects after biprobit
>       y  = Pr(vart,varotc=1) (predict)
>          =  .05270474
> 
> 2- How do I outreg marginal effects, significance and the s.e of
> marginal effects from biprobit?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index