Statalist


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: Re: st: gllamm with svy


From   nicola.baldini2@unibo.it
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: Re: st: gllamm with svy
Date   Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:52:56 +0200

I don't know what you are going to do, but it sounds similar to some problems on which I am working on and I guess that the following (and related do-file) may help:
Sophia Rabe-Hesketh and Anders Skrondal
Multilevel modelling of complex survey data
J. R. Statist. Soc. A (2006) 169, Part 4, pp. 805827

Nicola

At 02.33 18/07/2007 -0400, josemaria wrote:
>Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:49:37 -0500
>From: "Stas Kolenikov" <skolenik@gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: st: gllamm with svy
>
>You can use weights, although in multilevel framework, it is worth
>figuring out weights at different levels; and you can use -cluster-.
>So effectively it does the more important parts of the survey
>estimation, although you'd have to compromise some of the efficiency
>gains from stratification, you don't have exceptionally high sampling
>fractions... and you cannot actually use -svy- to prefix it with.
>
>On 7/17/07, josemaria <jmpsouza@usp.br> wrote:
>> Dear Statalisters:
>> does gllamm allow using svy?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index