[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
nicola.baldini2@unibo.it |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Simultaneous equations estimation |

Date |
Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:45:21 +0200 |

I have Stata 9 and I don't know -ivreg3-. But endogenous dummies are not a problem for -ivreg- (or -ivreg2-), e.g. http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-07/msg00710.html http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00337.html http://www.statacorp.com/statalist/archive/2005-07/msg00322.html http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-09/msg00339.html http://www.datasets.org/statalist/archive/2007-04/msg00415.html Nicola At 02.33 17/07/2007 -0400, "Mentzakis, Emmanouil" wrote: >Dear Statalist, > >I am trying to estimate a system of equations > >Y1 = Y2 + Y3 + X + Z1 >Y2 = X + Z2 >Y3 = X + Z3 > >Where, Y1 is an ordered categorical variable (could be collapsed to >binary variable) > Y2 is a continuous variable > Y3 is a binary variable > X is a vector of exogenous variable common across equations > Z1, Z2, Z3 are equation specific exogenous variables > >I am not sure how to estimate such a system due to the mixture of >variables. I think -reg3- and -ivreg3- cannot be used because I have >binary indicators. > >I was wondering if anyone could make any suggestions on how to proceed. > > >Thank you >Manos * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: st: gllamm with svy** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: svy: mean and descriptive tables** - Previous by thread:
**st: Simultaneous equations estimation** - Next by thread:
**RE: st: Simultaneous equations estimation** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |