Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Multinomial selection, but Selmlog/Svyselmlog not feasible


From   "Anders Alexandersson" <andersalex@gmail.com>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Multinomial selection, but Selmlog/Svyselmlog not feasible
Date   Tue, 22 May 2007 09:34:05 -0400

Thanks for the references. Ok, the user-written command -ssm- does not
allow the link mlogit and I don't know why. I speculate that there was
no simple good solution. For some related articles, see the whole SJ
issue 6-2, and the recent -gllamm- article at
http://www.gllamm.org/pub.html:
Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Skrondal, A. (2007). Multilevel and latent
variable modelling with composite links and exploded likelihoods.
Psychometrika, in press.

Best wishes,

Anders Alexandersson
andersalex@gmail.com

On 5/22/07, Guido Heineck <guido.heineck@gmx.net> wrote:
Anders,

thank you for your answer. Apologies for not providing references of the
mentioned papers. Here they are:

* Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., and M. Gurgand, 2007, Selection bias
corrections based on the multinomial logit model: Monte Carlo
Comparisons, Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), 174-205.

* Lee, L.F., 1983, Generalized econometric models with selectivity.
Econometrica, 51, 507–512.

Also, thank you for pointing me towards ssm. I only had a quick look at
it yet, but it apparently does not handle 'mlogit' for the selection
equation. Since one of the authors, Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, is also one of
the 'gllamm'-authors, I suppose multinomial selection cannot be
estimated by gllamm or why should they otherwise not include this option
in their 'ssm'-package?

Any further ideas?

Guido

...

 > A possible alternative is the "gllamm wrapper" ssm. See -findit ssm-
 > and the associated article in Stata Journal.

 > Guido Heineck <guido.heineck@gmx.net> wrote:
 > I want to examine the relationship between alcohol and wages. Taking
 > into account that smoking and drinking are related I estimate separate
 > models for smokers and nonsmokers.
 >
 > My question: Assuming that selection into employment and smoking are
 > not random, how can I correct for selection bias? I first thought of
 > using selmlog/svyselmlog by generating a multinomial selection var
 > (empl. smoker; empl. nonsmoker, not empl. smoker; not empl.
 > nonsmoker), but these progs require observed values in y for only one
 > of these categories/choices.
 >
 > Given that I observe wages for employees irrespective of smoking
 > behavior I cannot employ selmlog/svyselmlog. I'm thus somewhat stuck
 > since the authors of selmlog (Bourguignon et al.) show in their recent
 > J. of Economic Surveys article that the widely used procedure proposed
 > by Lee may not be appropriate.
 >
 > Any insights or ideas for alternatives?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index