[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: re: ksmirnov
David Airey <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu> writes:
> I have found that this test assumes random sampling. I had someone
> attempting it with multiple measures within animals.
> While I'm on this topic, I found a note in the Statalist saying
> implementation of ksmirnov is faulty for discrete data. As far as
> tell, it has not been fixed, despite Stas and Ben asking:
On March 8th, I posted to statalist saying a fix to -ksmirnov-
available in the next ado update.
I'm sorry I missed that, otherwise I would have waited patiently.
Put simply, there has not been a Stata 9 ado update since then.
of Stata updates is determined by many factors, one of them being
we've had enough items accumulated in the queue to justify the
logic behind that is that it is better to have a few updates with
items than many updates with only 1 or 2 items.
That being said, it has been too long since we've updated Stata 9.
be posting an ado update (that includes the fix to -ksmirnov-)
* For searches and help try: