Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: various fixes to NJC stuff on SSC


From   n j cox <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: RE: various fixes to NJC stuff on SSC
Date   Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:02:07 +0000

The language I am attempting to use is called
English. I am not responsible for shifts in meaning
in American versions of that language, nor are
Americans responsible for my usages.

I bow to Tom on his interpretation of contemporary
American usage, and I will look at some English dictionaries
on this point. I am naturally keen to confirm
that I was attempting a compliment. After all, without
Kit Baum to post all my bug fixes, where would I be?

Usage of "egregious" triggers memories of my first introduction
to the word in a Latin class, when the corresponding
word arose in translation and my teacher took
delight in pointing out that there was a splendid
English derivative. His argument that learning Latin
was an excellent way to build up your English vocabulary
seemed a bit roundabout to me, sympathetic though
I was to its charms.

Nick
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk


Steichen, Thomas J.

Nick Cox writes (in part):

-----Original Message----------------------------
Thanks to the egregious Kit Baum, various
packages have been added to or revised on SSC:
-------------------------------------------------

I presume, Nick, that you were using the archaic meaning
of the word "egregious," that being "distinguished or eminent."

The current (American) usage is to describes something
"extraordinary in some bad way" so I am totally convinced you
did not intend that modern meaning.


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index