[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: "no observations"
I'll try this. But any idea why -mfx- would give me that strange
error that there are no observations? That's what is confusing me.
I know there are observations because I just ran the model, and it
worked without a hitch! So why is it telling me there is no
observations? (I feel like the guy in OFFICE SPACE frustrated over
the fax machine telling him there's a paper jam, "when I know there
is no paper jam!" for those who know the movie reference.) ;)
I had a feeling it wasn't going to be as easy as my last message
suggested! What happens if you simplify the model and drop all the
interaction terms? I'm betting a global test of them would show
they are insignificant anyway.
* For searches and help try: