Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: "no observations"


From   Richard Williams <Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.edu>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: "no observations"
Date   Tue, 02 May 2006 08:53:51 -0500

At 07:17 AM 5/2/2006, Scott Cunningham wrote:
Richard,

Okay, that wasn't it.  You were right to point out that I had
included age in the varlist, which was not in the regression, but
notice the following output.  It doesn't seem to matter at all.
What's going on here?

xi:xtpoisson rp srfm age2 hgc hhd1 i.year i.census i.year*i.census,
fe i(id)
> vce(boot)
I had a feeling it wasn't going to be as easy as my last message suggested! What happens if you simplify the model and drop all the interaction terms? I'm betting a global test of them would show they are insignificant anyway.


-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: Richard.A.Williams.5@ND.Edu
WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/




© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index