[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Thomas Cornelißen <cornelissen@mbox.iqw.uni-hannover.de> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: Efficient way to solve for coefficents and standard errors ? |

Date |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:32:16 +0100 |

Dear all,

I want to implement a regression routine in Mata in order to use a large data set.

I have set up the system of moment equations

A*beta = B

I need to solve for beta and I need the covariance matrix of beta given by Cov(beta)=A^(-1)*(u'u)/(n-k). I want to get its diagonal elements and I am not interested in the off-diagonal elements.

Because I am concerned by memory and time restrictions I am looking for the most efficient way to solve for beta and for the standard errors.

I have considered:

Way 1: Solve for beta -cholsolve(A,B)- and then obtain A^(-1) by -cholinv(A)-

I am troubled by the fact that I am so-to-speak inverting A twice (i.e. using the solver twice). Isn't that inefficient?

Way 2: Invert A^(-1) by -cholinv(A)- and get beta by -quadcross(A^(-1), B)-

I wonder whether the additional cross product might induce numerical imprecisions, that I could possibly avoid by using way 1 to solve for beta.

Or is there a differen alternative based on the fact Given that I am only interested in the diagonal elements of A^(-1)? Is there a more time and memory saving way to ompute the standard errors, than inverting the whole A matrix?

Thanks for any remarks!

Best,

Thomas

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Institut für Quantitative Wirtschaftsforschung

Universität Hannover

Königsworther Platz 1

30167 Hannover

Tel.: +49-(0)511-762 5661

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: mysterious 601 error** - Next by Date:
**st: Classification after mlogit** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: mysterious 601 error** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Efficient way to solve for coefficents and standard errors ?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |