Dear Clive, many thanks for your response!
Alejandro
In message <[email protected]>
[email protected] writes:
> Alejandro Delafuente wrote:
>
> > There is a modified Wald statistic for testing groupwise
> > heteroskedasticity in
> > a fixed effect model under the command of xttest3. However, the help file
> > warns
> > that "simulations of the test statistic have shown that its power is very
> > low
> > in the context of fixed effects with "large N, small T" panels. In that
> > circumstance, the test should be used with caution." I believe my panel
> > fits
> > such description with around 14,000 observations and only 3 rounds. What
> > other
> > options do I have for testing heteroscedasticity?
>
> This Stata FAQ solution ought to help:
>
> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/panel.html
>
> However, this won't work for -xtreg, fe-, so do the following:
>
> (1) switch to fitting a fixed effect model using -areg, cluster()-;
> (2) then save the estimates;
> (3) run the same -areg- model without the -cluster()- option;
> (4) save the estimates again;
> (5) then compare!
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> CLIVE NICHOLAS |t: 0(044)7903 397793
> Politics |e: [email protected]
> Newcastle University |http://www.ncl.ac.uk/geps
>
> Whereever you go and whatever you do, just remember this. No matter how
> many like you, admire you, love you or adore you, the number of people
> turning up to your funeral will be largely determined by local weather
> conditions.
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
--
Alejandro de la Fuente
QEH/Department of International Development
Oxford University
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
