Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: RE: ask help for swilk


From   "Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: RE: ask help for swilk
Date   Thu, 8 Sep 2005 19:02:37 +0100

These tests are in any case not always very
informative and may constitute at best an 
ornamental oddity in a cul de sac, or something
required ritually by advisors or reviewers. 

There are at least two alternatives: 

1. Pretend that your data are survival times 
and fire up -streg- to fit a three-parameter lognormal. 

2. Take logs and fire up -qnorm-. This is not 
quite the same but it is often helpful. 

Nick 
n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk 

Salas, Jesus M.
 
> I believe it is fail to reject because the z statistic is not
> significant at any level...

Jiehua CHEN

> Does anyone know how to interpret the result of swilk 
> function. Like my
> result is
>   swilk ag, lnnormal
> 
>           Shapiro-Wilk W test for 3-parameter lognormal data
>      Variable |    Obs        W          V          z     Prob>z
> -------------+-------------------------------------------------
>            ag |   1199    0.79999    148.830     -1.088  0.86173
> 
> 
> Shall I reject or accept the null hypothesis?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index