[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Problem with -est table- after -xtmixed-
Miguel Foguel <firstname.lastname@example.org> asks:
> I am estimating a model using -xtmixed- and ols (for comparison purposes).
> The problem I have is the following: When I try to display the results for
> both models using -est table- (in fact -estout-) the results are not matched
> by the name of the variables. This seem to be caused by the fact that a
> strange "y" is showing up above the name of the variables in the display of
> the -xtmixed- model. As a result the display from ols includes an
> underscore sign above the variables' names too. As an example I give the
> following very simple code so that you can see what's going on.
> set obs 100
> gen x1 = uniform()
> gen eps = invnorm(uniform())
> gen y = 1 + x1 + eps
> reg y x1
> estimates store ols
> xtmixed y x1, mle
> estimates store xtm
> estimates table *
> Note that the variables are the same but the display from -est table- is not
> matched. Could anyone tell me how to sort this problem out? Many thanks in
. estimates table *, equations(y=1)
which forces Stata to match up the first equations and label them with the
name of the dependent variable, -y-.
-xtmixed- labels the first equation, the fixed portion, of the model with the
name of the dependent variable, as most Stata commands do. -regress-, on the
other hand, is an older command that does not label the equation. When
displaying coefficients from -regress-, -estimates table- uses an underscore
to denote the lack of such a label.
What I suggest above works around this.
* For searches and help try: