Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Matched variables in -estimates table-


From   "Clive Nicholas" <Clive.Nicholas@newcastle.ac.uk>
To   statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject   Re: st: Matched variables in -estimates table-
Date   Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:11:07 +0100 (BST)

Miguel Foguel wrote:

> I'm running some GMMs models in which I use the lag operator facility
> (e.g.
> L.y). I'm also estimating a Within-Groups model which I run "by hand",
> that
> is, by generating demeaned variables, including the lagged ones (this is
> because I don't want to estimate the constant that is automatically
> included
> in -xtreg ..., fe-). My problem is that when I use the -estimates table-
> command to display the results of all my models the variables in the
> column
> corresponding to the Within-Groups are not all matched with the variables
> of
> the other models (for instance, the demeaned lagged dependent - which I
> name
> Ly - is not matched with L.y from the GMMs). The question is whether it is
> possible to circumvent this problem so that I can have a matched-variable
> table produced by the -est table- command. I thank you in advance.

Have you tried Ben Jann's excellent -estout-, downloadable from SSC? I
think this may provide what you want. Good luck.

CLIVE NICHOLAS        |t: 0(044)7903 397793
Politics              |e: clive.nicholas@ncl.ac.uk
Newcastle University  |http://www.ncl.ac.uk/geps

Whereever you go and whatever you do, just remember this. No matter how
many like you, admire you, love you or adore you, the number of people
turning up to your funeral will be largely determined by local weather
conditions.

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index