Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: RE: twoway, legend(off)


From   "David Harrison" <david.harrison@icnarc.org>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: RE: twoway, legend(off)
Date   Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:45:04 +0100

tw (sc y date) (line fv date) , by(city, legend(off))

As stated in the manual and help for the legend option (although you may have to hunt for it), when using -by()- anything that affects the location of the legend (which includes turning it off altogether) must go inside the -by()- whereas anything that affects the content goes outside.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Dear [mailto:keith.dear@anu.edu.au]
Sent: 14 April 2005 07:34
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: twoway, legend(off)


I am making a set of ordinary graphs of data plus fitted values:

tw (sc y date) (line fv date) , legend(off) by(city)

But the legend(off) option is ignored. I suspect that this is because 
legend() is merged-implicit, and the by() option must be issuing a legend 
option of its own which overrides mine (if I omit -by(city)- then the 
legend disappears).

Does anyone know how I can give the legend a myth?
Thanks
KD

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index