[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: Stata 9 announcement
On 2005-04-05, at 15:58, Steichen, Thomas J. wrote (in part):
It is with some curiosity that I note that previous such announcements
have led to an immediate and wide-ranging discussion on Statalist,
yet this message was met with thunderous silence. My question is why?
I can only speak for my self, but I was very excited when I read the
news. I can't wait to play around with the new mixed procedures. The
long wait since Roberto G. Gutierre's early announcement
(http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-04/msg00721.html) is now
over. Maybe my expectations are too high for my own good, but I'm sure
Stata will be very competitive in this segment.
. Perhaps what 9 offers is not of interest?
On 2005-04-05, at 14:59, David Airey wrote:
I look forward to being the first to send questions to this list on
linear mixed models.
Not if I can beat you to it ;)
* For searches and help try: