[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"Renzo Comolli" <renzo.comolli@yale.edu> |

To |
<statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Help with heckman |

Date |
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:48:31 -0400 |

Dear Natalia, The previous responder (Stas Kolenikov) gives you a suggestion that can certainly be true, but I think there might be more than that. There are several different types of mistakes that you could be doing all conceptually leading to the same incorrect result, but the most likely cause is just that you mixed up the two syntaxes for -heckman, twostep- I think it all boils down to the fact that you left out an = sign, but let's just write it out all so we are sure. I think I understand your example but I am not sure, therefore allow me to use the example from the manual use http://www.stata-press.com/data/r8/womenwk.dta, clear * note that in this dataset wage is sometimes missing heckman wage educ age, select(married children educ age) twostep // [1] gen wage2=wage replace wage2=0 if wage>=. gen group=(wage<.) heckman wage2 educ age, select(group= married children educ age) twostep // [2] probit group married children educ age predict phat, xb gen mills=exp(-0.5*phat*phat)/(sqrt(2*_pi)*normprob(phat)) reg wage educ age mills //[3] Note that [1] and [2] are two mathematically identical ways of setting up the same problem, the only difference is in the Stata syntax. Your example does not have the = sign and therefore it looks like my sintax [1], but I think you meant the syntax [2] and forgot the = The syntax [2] is useful only when wage is never missing, confusingly enough (confusingly for a novice, but smart from StataCorp point of view) you could still use it even when wage is already missing so even writing the following would have worked gen group=(wage<.) heckman wage educ age, select(group= married children educ age) twostep // [2b] Here in [2b] both wages have their missing and the group variable acts as a selector, one of the two is redundant, but Stata is not tripped by the redundancy. So, to summarize it all, the most likely mistake is that you should have written heckman hheck esc exp, select (trab= rpcf2) twostep Best, Renzo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- *From "Natalia Ferreira" <nat6672@hotmail.com> To statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject st: Help with heckman Date Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:28:17 +0000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Hi everyone I have been trying to estimate a Heckman but I´m having problems with the procedure implemantation in Stata. When I estimate Heckman by two different equations: first probit (work/ not work) and than after a regress (wage) with the mills that I got from the probit; I get different results that when I estimate heckman twosteps with only one procedure (command "heckamn"). The two different rotines are below, if anyone can tell me what is going wrong I appreciate. Thanks, Natalia Rotine 1: gen hheck= ln_rend replace hhec=. if hheck==0 probit trab rpcf2 predict phat if e(sample), xb gen mills = exp(-0.5*phat*phat)/(sqrt(2*_pi)*normprob(phat)) reg hheck esc exp mills if e(sample) Rotine 2: gen hheck= ln_rend replace hhec=. if hheck==0 heckman hheck esc exp, select (trab rpcf2) twostep * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Stata 9 Wish List** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: using datasets from stata examples** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Help with heckman** - Next by thread:
**st: lags for xi created vars** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |