Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: Re: What's off-topic for Statalist? (was How to calculate adjusted standard errors in Quattro Pro)


From   "Michael Blasnik" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: Re: What's off-topic for Statalist? (was How to calculate adjusted standard errors in Quattro Pro)
Date   Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:44:07 -0400

I would think that your comparison of an ocassional Statalist thread
mentioning MS Word (which obviously is welcomed by at least a fair number of
list readers) to SARS and people coughing up blood has helped reinforce my
use of the word absurd.  But I fear this topic has gone on long enough -- we
might scare others into unsubscribing...

Michael Blasnik
[email protected]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "SamL" <[email protected]>
To: "Stata Listserve" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: st: Re: What's off-topic for Statalist? (was How to calculate
adjusted standard errors in Quattro Pro)


> Absurd?  Boy, I am sure glad the people who had to make the call on
> whether to quarantine China during the SARS event weren't thinking as you
> suggest we should.  :-) Michael, epidemics *always* start small.  It isn't
> the number of cases that should draw your attention, it is the extremity
> of their expression.  Someone saying, "Statalisters, help me do this in
> MSWord because I don't have time to read the manual" should draw attention
> that discourages the behavior.  Answering helpfully only encourages the
> behavior.  Similarly, saying, "It was only one incident," is only to serve
> to delay action until there are additional incidents; if we wait too long,
> we won't be able to prevent the incidents from overwhelming the list.  It
> would be like saying, "This person who died after coughing up blood in the
> hallway is pretty sad, and we have no idea why that happpened but, not to
> worry, it was just one case."  Epidemics always start with a small number
> of cases.  Wise actors keep them from becoming epidemics by acting when
> the number of cases is low.  It isn't absurd, it's the most effective
> response.
>
> Unlike in medicine, which has various therapies and responses to maladies,
> in social action, and in the commons, talk is about the only resource we
> have to encourage helpful behavior and discourage non-helpful behavior.
> No one paid you for your nice code, and no one pays anyone on statalist
> for all the helpful advice.  But your rep--talk about you--is positive,
> because you've contributed to the commons.  As a social scientist, I have
> come to see such things are important.  Talk may be cheap, but it is also
> worthwhile. ;-)
>
> Take care, from one east coaster to another, and to others on other
> continents and coasts,
>
> Sam
>


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index