|From||Christopher F Baum <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject||st: regression on quartiles|
|Date||Sat, 15 May 2004 09:17:29 -0400|
I don't think sureg is what you want -- sureg is used for models estimated
on the same sample. What you want is more like a Chow test or, preferably,
just create interaction terms on the slope (and/or intercept). This latter
approach can be done for you by xi. For example, if you create zquart to
hold the quartiles of Z, then you could
xi: reg Y X i.zquart*X
and then look at the significance of the _I terms and perform tests on them
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vuri, Daniela" <Daniela.Vuri@iue.it>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:43 AM
Subject: st: compare coefficients after sureg
> Dear Stata users,
> I have the following problem.
> I have a regression of Y on X and Z and I want to see if the effect of Z
is different across quartile of Z.
> I do the following:
> gen quart=1 if Z is in the first quartile
> replace quart=2 if Z is in the second quartile
> replace quart=3 if Z is in the third quartile
> replace quart=4 if Z is in the fourth quartile
> and then I do the following
> bysort quart: sureg(Y X)
> at this point I would like to test whether the beta coefficient I get in
the first equation (the first quartile) is equal to the beta coefficient I
get in the second equation (the second quartile) and so on.
> Is sureg the right command? and how can I get the test of equality of the
coefficients across quartiles?