[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
David Airey <david.airey@Vanderbilt.Edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: re: st: permutation, strata() for empirical statistic distributions |

Date |
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:27:30 -0600 |

Thank you for this useful tutorial. More thanks below.

David Airey <david.airey@vanderbilt.edu> asks about using -permute- with aAfter I found this out first hand, I knew my example was not well thought out. My apologies. But here I see how to handle the slashes and pipes in the command--they go outside the quotes. Thank you!

nested ANOVA:

> Here's a concrete example of what I want to do using permute. I have a

> simple data set with 2 groups, 5 subjects per group, and 10 replicate

> measures per subject. The anova statement for this data is:

>

> . anova y group / subject|group /

>

> I'd like to use permute in the same way as the example on page 157 of

> R[N-R], "permute", to get a distribution of statistics for my data

> permuted within subject within group. Does "permute" handle nested

> models? I'm assuming the option strata(subject group) does this?

>

> How would one write a program equivalent to the one given on page 157

> for the model above? The program on page 157 for the anova model "anova

> y treatment subject" is:

>

> program panova

> version 8.0

> args response fac_intrst fac_other

> anova `response' `fac_intrst' `fac_other'

> test `fac_intrst'

> end

>

> This program is called by the permute statement:

>

> . permute treatment "panova y treatment subject" treatmentF=r(F)

> modelF=e(F), reps(1000) strata(subject) saving(permanova)

>

> My problem is that the examples don't tell me what to do with the / |

> characters in my anova statement.

For David's particular analysis, the -panova- program can be modified to

accommodate the call to -anova-, but I'm not sure what statistic David had an

interest in (of its permutation distribution). Assuming David is only

interested in the permutation distribution of the F statistic of -group- on

-subject|group-, then David could use the following:

***** BEGIN: panova_nest.ado

program panova_nest

version 8.0

args response group subject

anova `response' `group' / `subject'|`group' /

test `group' / `subject'|`group'

end

***** END: panova_nest.ado

Unfortunately, using -panova_nest- with -permute- and supplying the option

-strata(subject group)- will NOT have the expected result. The -anova- and

-test- results will be the same for each permutation because the effect of the

following command

. permute y "panova_nest y group subject" groupF=r(F),

reps(5) strata(group subject)

is to permute the response values within each subject of each group, thus the

sum of squares from each permutation will all be the same, so the F test will

take on the same value as well.

I see. The treatment identifiers are moved around, the response stays still. This helps too.

The example in [R] permute on page 157 works out because of 2 things:

1. The hypothesis of interest was clearly identified.

The hypothesis associated with the F statistic for the treatment

effect.

2. There is a way to permute the data that is consistent with the hypothesis

of interest.

The null hypothesis for the example on page 157 is that there is no

treatment effect, thus randomly permuting the treatment identifiers

among the observations should result in values of the F statistics

that are similar to the one we observed.

Note that we permute theThis brings up my need to investigate what the difference between strata() and cluster() is, since permute has a strata() option.

treatment ids within subject, because we do not want to confound our

result with a possible subject effect (which is not part of the

hypothesis we are interested in).

If David is interested in the permutation distribution of

test group / subject|group

then a little more programming is required because -permute- is not able to

permute groups of observations, that is, -permute- does not have a -cluster()-

option.

Thank you Jeff.

If David's groups were unbalanced, I would have to end the discussion here

given that a solution is beyond the scope of this little email.

Fortunately, David's since data is balanced, I can keep going. Since the

groups are balanced (in both the number of subjects but also the number of

replicates per subject), we would do the following:

1. reshape the data from long to wide, making sure that the subject ids are

unique between group (it also helps to have a replicate id within subject

before we reshape)

2. modify the program that -permute- calls to reshape the data back to long,

run the -anova-, run the -test-, post the results of -test- to -r()-, and

reshape back to wide.

Here is a modification of -panova_nest_ from above that accounts for

reshaping the data.

***** BEGIN: panova_nest_reshape.ado

program panova_nest_reshape, rclass

version 8.0

args response group subject

reshape long

capture noisily {

anova `response' `group' / `subject'|`group' /

test `group' / `subject'|`group'

return add

}

local rc = c(rc)

reshape wide

exit `rc'

end

***** END: panova_nest_reshape.ado

Here is what I did to reshape the data when testing this idea:

. egen id = group(group subject)

. bysort id : gen obs = _n

. reshape wide y, i(id) j(obs)

Now just use -permute- with the wide data and new program:

. permute group "panova_nest_reshape y group subject"

groupF=r(F), reps(5)

--Jeff

jpitblado@stata.com

I'll make an unrelated public statement. While making the tough choice to learn R to fill in what is missing in StataSE 8.2 (general mixed model procedures like NLME/LME in R), I also decided to send my money to Stata for software upgrades, as the service and quality is so high. At the moment I use:

Data Desk 6, for EDA graphics

R, for general mixed model procedures not possible in StataSE

StataSE, for everything else.

(Two typos on page 157, at the top of the page the number of treatments is 10, not five, and at the bottom of the page the word expected should be expect).

-Dave

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: clogit or logistic for matched pairs** - Next by Date:
**st: Re: clogit or logistic for matched pairs** - Previous by thread:
**Re: re: st: permutation, strata() for empirical statistic distributions** - Next by thread:
**st: scalar troubles?** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |