Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: clogit or logistic for matched pairs


From   Michael Ingre <Michael.Ingre@ipm.ki.se>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: clogit or logistic for matched pairs
Date   Thu, 06 Nov 2003 17:01:18 +0100

Dear statalist

I want to estimate the risk for an exposed twin to develop a symptom
relative an unexposed twin. I have 169 pairs of monozygotic twins that are
discordant on my exposure variable. The basic design is a case (exposed) -
control (unexposed) study. The outcome variable (symptom) is binary coded.

The most obvious method should be -clogit- however, I'm not satisfied with
the statistics.

Like McNemar, it excludes the ties between cases and controls and the odds
ratio returned describes the ratio of cases "winning" over controls.
However, I would like to estimate the ratio of a case to HAVE the symptom
(not "winning") compared to the control.

I have been criticized for using logistic regression with the cluster option
and robust variance estimator. My OR is said to be invalid.

Actually, the criticism is harder than that: My analyses is said to be
"completely meaningless".

. logistic dv iv , cluster(twinpairid)

Do you have any advice?

Thanks in advance

Michael Ingre

----------------- 
PhD-student 
Department of Psychology
Stockholm University &
National Institute for
Psychoscial Medicine
 



*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index