[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Christopher F Baum <baum@bc.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Re: ivreg2 use |

Date |
Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:24:46 -0400 |

On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 02:33 AM, Busakom wrote:

Almost correct. You should disabuse yourself of the notion that "this is an instrument for that"; as frequently mentioned on this list and in the cited Stata FAQ, instrumental variables estimators do not work that way. All of the Z variables are instruments for all of the included Y variables. That said, what about your proposed regression?I have two simultaneous equations: (1) y1 = a0*y2 + a1*x1 + a2*x2 + a3*x3 + e (2) y2 = b0*y1 + b1*z1 + b2*z2 + b3*z3 + u The variables are first-differences. As I understand, I can perform 2SLS by using ivreg2: ivreg2 y1 x1 x2 x3 (y2 = z1 z2 z3) My problem is slightly more complicated than this. What if, in each equation, there is a lag dependent variable: (3) y1 = a0*y2 + a1*x1 + a2*x2 + a3*x3 + a4*Ly1 + e (4) y2 = b0*y1 + b1*z1 + b2*z2 + b3*z3 + b4*Ly2 + u Here, Ly1 is correlated with e, and Ly2 is correlated with u. I plan to instrument Ly1 with L2y1 (two-period lag of y1) and Ly2 with L2y2 (two-period lag of y2). I believe I can still use ivreg2 to deal with this problem. My question is whether the following command syntax is correct? ivreg2 y1 x1 x2 x3 (y2 Ly1 Ly2 = z1 z2 z3 L2y1 L2y2) And is -ivreg2, gmm- is the same as -ivgmm0-?

Your first equation contains regressors y2, x1-x3, and Ly1. It does not contain Ly2, so Ly2 should not be present in the included endogenous list to the left of the equals sign, or it will appear as a regressor in the equation, which presumably it should not. The instrument list is correct, if your assertion that the second lags are orthogonal to e and u is warranted. This can be tested with a diff-Sargan test (ivreg2 orthog option). Note that ivreg2 will report that the instruments include x1, x2, x3 plus those you have specified (and constant) -- and that is correct. The included exogeneous variables are indeed instruments as well.

ivreg2, gmm is essentially the same estimator as the earlier ivgmm0. A version of ivreg2 is currently under development which will provide 'ivgmmN' -- that is, allowing for arbitrary heteroskedasticity and serial correlation in the error process. ivgmm0 (and its implementation within ivreg2) only allows for the former.

Kit

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: Re: Re: ivreg2 use***From:*"Luis Fernandes Rodrigues" <nop44660@netcabo.pt>

- Prev by Date:
**st: AW: RE: how to control jitering in scatter plots** - Next by Date:
**st: F value for logit, cluster()** - Previous by thread:
**st: AW: RE: how to control jitering in scatter plots** - Next by thread:
**st: Re: Re: ivreg2 use** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |