[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Christopher R Berry <cberry@fas.harvard.edu> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: Hierarchical Selection Model |

Date |
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:28:00 -0400 |

I am using Stata 8. I would like to know if anyone has advice on how to approach the following model. I’m looking at school board elections, where I have data on all school board elections in one state. I would like to test whether certain variables improve a challenger’s share of the vote relative to an incumbent. There are two stages of selection involved. First, the incumbent decides whether or not to run for re-election. Second, if the incumbent runs, she may or may not face a challenger. For races in which the incumbent runs *and* faces a challenger, we observe the challenger’s vote share and the incumbent’s share. For what it’s worth, the incumbent’s vote share is 100% whenever she runs and there is no challenger; the challenger’s vote share is 100% whenever there is no incumbent. But the interesting case is when there is both an incumbent and a challenger. I’d like to model the challenger’s vote share as a function of other attributes of the district. My question is how to estimate the selection model in Stata. An additional wrinkle is that the vote share data are at the precinct level, whereas the decision of the candidates to run is made at the district level. In other words, there are J districts with Pj precints in each district (Pj not equal for all J). When a candidate runs, she runs in every precinct in the district. So the two-stages of selection occur at the district level (i.e., are identical for every precinct within a district), but the vote share varies by precinct. So I could first estimate a probit model for incumbent running or not. Then generate the inverse Mills ratio (IMR) and include that in a second probit model estimating whether or not the race is contested (restricting estimation to cases where there is an incumbent running). Both of these equations would be estimated at the district level. I take the IMR from the second equation and include it in the final vote share equation, which would be estimated at the precinct level (the IMR, which would have been estimated at the district level in step 2, would then be identical across all precincts in a district in the vote share model). Estimation of the final equation would be restricted to cases where both an incumbent and a challenger are running. But how to calculate standard errors appropriately in all the equations? If anyone has ideas about how to do this better, I’d be much obliged. Thanks, Chris * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

- Prev by Date:
**st: RE: cumulative rates** - Next by Date:
**st: Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 17:39:31 +0100** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: cumulative rates** - Next by thread:
**st: Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 17:39:31 +0100** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |