[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
Re: st: LR-tests and Xtnbreg
Jon Heron <firstname.lastname@example.org> asks:
> I have a question about the LR-test given at the end of xtnbreg output.
> Is this a test of the variance of the beta random effect being equal to
Yes it is.
> If so, why, when I compare the likelihoods of an xtnbreg model with it's
> equivalent nbreg model does (2 x) the difference not agree with the
> chi-square value quoted in this test? The discrepancy is slight, but I do
> obtain an exact agreement when comparing the likelihoods of poisson and
> xtpois in the same way.
Note that there are two parameterizations of the negative binomial that
are available under -nbreg-, the mean dispersion (default) and the constant
dispersion (option -dispersion(constant)-).
The model associated with -xtnbreg- is a generalization of the constant
dispersion parameterization of the negative binomial. Thus, if you are going
to calculate likelihood ratio tests manually, you need to specify
-dispersion(constant)- with -nbreg-.
> Furthermore, since these 4 models appear to be nested, why can't I use the
> 'lrtest' command to assess their relative worth?
-lrtest- will complain if your models, even though nested, are fitted using
different estimation commands. A little too cautious perhaps, yet we feel
this is a necessary safeguard against calculating likelihood ratios for
When you are sure that the models are nested, you can turn off this safeguard
by specifying option -force- to -lrtest-.
* For searches and help try: