[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Halvorsen Thomas <Thomas.Halvorsen@sintef.no> |

To |
"'statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu'" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
st: interpreting the coefficient of the inverse Mills' ratio |

Date |
Sun, 11 May 2003 20:48:36 +0200 |

Title:

Dear list,

I know this is not a Stata-specific question, but I know no other forum better able to answer this.

I'm running a two-step Heckman procedure creating an inverse Mills' ratio (IMR) variable with the "mills" option.

My question is how the coefficient of this variable is interpreted when used as an ordinary independent variable in the regression equation (second step)?

Is this a correct interpretation?:

When the coefficient of IMR is positive there are unobserved variables that both increase the probability of selection and a higher than average score on the dependent variable. When the coefficient of IMR is negative there are unobserved variables increasing the probability of selection and the probability of a lower than average score on the dependent variable.

Thomas

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: multiple if??** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: multiple if??** - Previous by thread:
**st: graph syntax and smalldlg queries** - Next by thread:
**st: multiple if** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |