[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Ronan Conroy <rconroy@rcsi.ie> |

To |
"statalist hsphsun2.harvard.edu" <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |

Subject |
Re: st: Sample size for ttest - (am I wrong?) |

Date |
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:39:31 +0000 |

on 18/02/2003 9:44 pm, Ricardo Ovaldia at ovaldia@yahoo.com wrote: > Thank you David and Ronan. I'm confused by the > apparent contradictions in the two posts. I understood > how Ronan calculated the power but its this valid? Or > is the problem (as I originally suspected) that a > "difference of 1.5 SD" doesn't mean anything without > knowing something about the distribution of the two > groups? Am I missing something? I don't think there's a contradiction. What we are saying is that the maths is all right, but as we all know power calculation is the application of precise statistical procedures to wild assumptions. The first thing to note is that we don't even know how how the researcher is measuring Cox2. In several of the papers I have been involved in, Cox2 has been measured on an ordinal scale, with expression rated in four categories from none to intense. If this is the case, then talking about means and standard deviations is nonsense. Cox2 can also be measured as a percentage expression. This may be what your researcher is doing. However, even if this is the case, there is the issue of what constitutes a clinically significant difference between groups. Let's look at the issue of 1.5 standard deviations. In the case of Cox2, with an average expression of 50%, the standard deviation is about 30%. So a difference of 1.5 standard deviations between groups corresponds to a 45% difference in mean expression! Clearly, differences a lot smaller than this are clinically interesting. We did some work on Cox2 and polyp type and the results were considered clinically interesting enough to get a major journal publication though the actual size of the mean difference in Cox2 expression was less than 10%! A difference of about 10% would be clinically interesting, which corresponds to a third of a standard deviation. . sampsi 50 60, sd(30) Estimated sample size for two-sample comparison of means Test Ho: m1 = m2, where m1 is the mean in population 1 and m2 is the mean in population 2 Assumptions: alpha = 0.0500 (two-sided) power = 0.9000 m1 = 50 m2 = 60 sd1 = 30 sd2 = 30 n2/n1 = 1.00 Estimated required sample sizes: n1 = 190 n2 = 190 Ooof! 90% power applied to what we know about the real life distribution of Cox2 produces a horrifying picture: two groups of 190! Your colleague's parroting of (literally) correct power calculations just underlines the concerns that David voiced more articulately than I, and which I repeat: power calculation is the application of precise statistical procedures to wild assumptions When the researcher is not even aware of what these assumptions are, then the ethics committee should send them away to reconsider. But you may draw comfort from the fact that your hunch was very right. Cox2 is going to need sample sizes waaaaay bigger than 8! Ronan M Conroy (rconroy@rcsi.ie) Lecturer in Biostatistics Royal College of Surgeons Dublin 2, Ireland +353 1 402 2431 (fax 2764) -------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Sample size for ttest - (am I wrong?)***From:*Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>

**References**:**Re: st: Sample size for ttest - (am I wrong?)***From:*Ricardo Ovaldia <ovaldia@yahoo.com>

- Prev by Date:
**st: How to Obtain Variance Decomposition and Impulse Response Function in VAR?** - Next by Date:
**st: hazard function** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Sample size for ttest - (am I wrong?)** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Sample size for ttest - (am I wrong?)** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |