[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
"David Moore" <davem@hartman-group.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
st: RE: RE: syntax question |

Date |
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:20:10 -0800 |

Nick has correctly guessed the Stata idiom for converting most of the illustrated SAS programming constructs. One problem, however, is that SAS allows variable arrays and I believe these still do not exist in Stata. You can program around this, of course, but that's not a simple matter of converting from one language to another. Those with Stata 7 will benefit from the "new" looping commands. Those of us who still can't afford to upgrade must resort to -while- loops. -----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu]On Behalf Of Nick Cox Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 5:40 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: RE: syntax question angelach@u.washington.edu > > Hi Stata users, I'm now trying to convert SAS language to > Stata. Since I'm relatively new to Stata, any help will be > greatly appreciated!!!! > > The SAS language I try to rewrite for Stata is > > do i =1 to 6; > > if (ICAT EQ i) then do; > > do j =1 to 4; > > if (KiAj{j,1} > 0) and (KiGj{j,1} > 0) then do; > IGC{i} =IGC{i} + KiGj{j,1}; > IGC_h{i} =IGC_h{i} + KiAj{j,1}; > IHC{i} =IHC{i} + KiHj{j,1}; > end; > What is SAS? Or more seriously, I don't know SAS, so I am guessing. do seems to map to -forvalues-. There is a tutorial on -forvalues- -- for which you need to know the rudiments of local macros -- at http://www.stata.com/support/meeting/8uk/fortitude.pdf EQ presumably is a test for equality so that is ==. The main pitfall to be aware is the difference in Stata between the -if- command and the -if- qualifier. See http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/lang/ifqualifier.html Nick n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**st: RE: RE: RE: syntax question***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

**References**:**st: RE: syntax question***From:*"Nick Cox" <n.j.cox@durham.ac.uk>

- Prev by Date:
**st: Convention RE ado's which may redefine value labels** - Next by Date:
**st: RE: Convention RE ado's which may redefine value labels** - Previous by thread:
**st: RE: syntax question** - Next by thread:
**st: RE: RE: RE: syntax question** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2016 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |