Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: posting on behalf of Jill Huppert

From   baum <>
To   StataList <>
Subject   st: posting on behalf of Jill Huppert
Date   Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:37:05 -0400

Hi, Statlisters.
I hope you can help.
I have been exploring a publically avail dataset (NHAMCS), which includes all weighting variables, and their documentation says I should be able to get accurate estimates and SE using STATA.
However, my statistical colleague uses SUDAAN. I have been able to match her point estimates, but not SE.
We discovered that she uses many more weighting variables in SUDAAN than STATA requires.

So my command looks like:

pweight: patwt
PSU: psum

xi: svylogit outcome var1 var 2 i.var1*var2 patwt, str(stratm1) psu(psum)sub(sample) or

Wheras in SUDAAN, Jane uses all of the following:
stratm psum subfile prostrat su poppsum popsu popvism popprovm
( and sets levels)

Am I missing the finite pop ct variable? (fpc)
Anyone else use STATA for NHAMCS?

Can Stata handle interaction terms in svy data?

Many thanks.
Jill Huppert

Christopher F Baum, Boston College Economics, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA
* For searches and help try:

© Copyright 1996–2017 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index