[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

From |
Gary Longton <glongton@fhcrc.org> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: problem with -forvalues- |

Date |
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:19:40 -0700 |

Estie Hudes wrote:

the -forvalues- syntax does not really accept a "numlist", rather a "range" which is more narrowly defined in the online help for -forvalues-.I have been using -for- for a very long time now, and like it's capabilities. However, I know it has its limits, and doesn't with a very complicated sequence of commands. I recently read Nick Cox' wonderful "Speaking Stata" column, and decided to try and use -foreach- -forval-, instead of -for-. I have run into problems with -forval-. When my numlist is of the form "1 0", "0 1", "1", -forval- complains about "invalid syntax". It works with "0/1" or "1(-1)0". With "1/0" it doesn't complain, but displays no results. -for-, on the other hand, works with all of the above.

0/1 and 1(-1)0 are acceptable ranges under the definition; "1 0" "0 1" and "1" are not.

1/0 is apparently acceptable range syntax, but translates to "1 to 0 in steps of 1", yielding an empty set.

-foreach-, on the other hand, WILL accept a numlist if the appropriate syntax is used. Eg.

.foreach i of numlist 1 0 -3 { di in yel "i: `i'" }

i: 1

i: 0

i: -3

. foreach i of numlist 1/-3 { di in yel "i: `i'" }

i: 1

i: 0

i: -1

i: -2

i: -3

- Gary

*

* For searches and help try:

* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html

* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq

* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**References**:**st: problem with -forvalues-***From:*EHudes@psg.ucsf.edu

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: what time is it?** - Next by Date:
**st: clearing the results window** - Previous by thread:
**st: problem with -forvalues-** - Next by thread:
**st: clearing the results window** - Index(es):

© Copyright 1996–2015 StataCorp LP | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |