Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: mi estimate and GLLAMM


From   Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: mi estimate and GLLAMM
Date   Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:14:21 -0500

What version of Stata are you using? -mi estimate- has -cmdok- option
that you need to specify to proceed with user-written commands. With
some luck, -variance- option may give you the variances of the random
effects, as by default -mi- would report the results in whatever
metric -gllamm- uses to parameterize the random effects (Cholesky
decomposition, if I recall correctly).

-- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (ASA, SSC)
-- Principal Survey Scientist, Abt SRBI
-- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the
position of my employer
-- http://stas.kolenikov.name



On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Pesola, Francesca
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I have imputed my data using multiple imputation and I would now like to analyse the data using GLLAMM; however, Stata produces an error message which says GLLAMM is not supported by mi estimate.
>
> I know mi estimate supports the xt-family commands for clustered data but  there does not seem to be an xt command for multinomial logistic regression, which is what I need.
>
> Any suggestion would be very much appreciated!
>
> Thanks,
> Francesca
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index