Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Match treated to not-treated firms


From   Laura-Sophie Henning <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Match treated to not-treated firms
Date   Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:12:54 +0100

Dear all,
I want to identify matches for a set of treated firms and am not sure which matching command allows best to incorporate my matching criteria.
My sample includes 300 treated and 25,000 not-treated firms. The binary variable "treated" (either 0 or 1) indicates treatment. The sample spans the years 2000-2011, across all 2-digit SIC codes.
For each treated firm, I would like to find 5 non-treated matches (with replacement). I would want non-treated matches to be in the same year, 2-digit SIC industry, and size quintile (total assets), and to have the smallest possible absolute difference in terms of book-to-market ratio.
I had a look at cem, nmatch and mahapick but did not find a way to account for all these criteria. Can somebody help? Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Laura Sophie Henning 		 	   		  
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index