Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: st: RE: Fama-MacBeth regression


From   "Francis, Richard N" <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   RE: st: RE: Fama-MacBeth regression
Date   Fri, 3 Jan 2014 19:08:20 +0000

Adrian,

I'm sorry. Hope you find what you need!

Rick Francis
Associate Professor
Department of Accounting
College of Business Administration
University of Texas at El Paso
500 W. University Avenue
El Paso, TX  79968
Office: 915-747-7953
FAX: 915-747-8618
Email:  [email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Stork
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: RE: Fama-MacBeth regression

Dear Rick

Thank you for answering. I know about that side and that code and I also would use it but unfortunately to use it I would need to get my dataset (as described below) into a panel dataset which as simple as it sounds at the beginning is not as easy because I have 306 rows (i.e. months)  and 201 columns (one column for the date, 100 columns for the portfolios, and 100 columns for the estimated coefficients from first-pass regressions). And simply reshaping does not help because it only reshapes either the portfolios or the coefficients).
Also Mitch Petersen's fm-code does not include the first-pass regression.

Best,
Adrian

2014/1/3 Francis, Richard N <[email protected]>:
> Adrian,
>
> Attached is the Stata code for the FM regression.
>
> Code is from Mitch Petersen (http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/petersen/htm/papers/se/se_programming.htm).
>
> Good luck!
>
> Rick Francis
> Associate Professor
> Department of Accounting
> College of Business Administration
> University of Texas at El Paso
> 500 W. University Avenue
> El Paso, TX  79968
> Office: 915-747-7953
> FAX: 915-747-8618
> Email:  [email protected]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian 
> Stork
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:23 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: Fama-MacBeth regression
>
> Dear all
>
> I'm trying to run a second-pass cross-sectional regression which is part of what finance researchers call a Fama-MacBeth regression.
> I managed to get the beta-coefficients from the first-pass regression but now I'm stuck at the second-pass CSR.
> So my dataset looks currently like this (time period starts in 1987m7 and ends 2012m12):
>
>
>                    ________________portfolios________________________
>        _________________coefficients__________________________
>
> date2   exsize_1        exsize_2        exsize_3        exbm_1  exbm_2  exbm_3  betaexsize_1    betaexsize_2    betaexsize_3    betaexbm_1      betaexbm_2      betaexbm_3
> .... etc.
> 1989m6  .31     3.41    3.10    2.83    2.25    1.02    .64     .68     .67     .63     .76     .65
> 1989m7  1.16    1.85    4.93    9.40    3.31    4.65    .64     .68     .67     .63     .76     .65
> 1989m8  2.45    2.94    6.85    4.50    3.82    4.76    .64     .68     .67     .63     .76     .65
> 1989m9  -.60    1.38    -1.56   2.69    -.72    -1.38   .64     .68     .67     .63     .76     .65
> 1989m10 -1.46   -1.41   -.89    .11     -1.25   1.89    .64     .68     .67     .63     .76     .65
> etc.
>
> Now I need to regress at each individual month all the portfolios against the their estimated coefficient.
> But that is exactly what I'm not able to manage. In the end there should be one figure at each time period t which corresponds to the new coefficient from the individual cross-sectional regressions As you can see I merely added the prefix "beta" for the coefficients with respect to its portfolio.
>
> The best I could come with is the following:
>
> .ds ex*
>
> .forval i=330/635{
> .foreach v of varlist `r(varlist)' {
> .       regress `v' beta`v' if date2==`i'
> .       gen lambda`v' = _b[beta`v']
> .}
> .}
>
> but here the error message is "insufficient observations" although all obsevations are nonmissing.
> I know there is a code from Kellog University
> (http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/petersen/htm/papers/se/fm
> .ado) but that does not include the first pass regression and brings 
> me to the same point. Also I want to understand the entire procedure and follow my results.
> Thus, does anyone have an idea how to retrieve the second pass regression coefficients (the beta coefficient in the second pass regression is perfectly fine and enough - no need for the constant or the residuals right now).
> I guess reshaping the dataset might also be an alternative beginning compared to the code I wrote above.
>
> Best,
> Adrian
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index