Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: binary outcome IV with 2 endogenous variables (binary and continuous)
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: binary outcome IV with 2 endogenous variables (binary and continuous)
Date
Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:30:33 +0100
Hi Dimitriv:
You can use -cmp- (available from ssc) to do this easily:
cmp (y = d1 x2) (d1 = z1 z2 ) (x2 = z1 z2), ind(4 4 1) qui
Best,
J.
__________________________________________
John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management
Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor:
The Leadership Quarterly
Organizational Research Methods
__________________________________________
On 14.12.2013 01:00, Dimitriy V. Masterov wrote:
What is the best way to estimate a cross-sectional model where
* the outcome y is binary
* endogenous binary covariate d1 with instrument z1
* endogenous continuous covariate x2 with instrument z2
I know 2SLS can handle this with ivregress y (d1 x2 = z1 z2) or reg3,
but I am reluctant to estimate the LPM model. Can this be handled in
the SEM framework with a covariance restriction? Are there other
methods I should consider?
DVM
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/