st: RE: Oxaca decomposition with heckman

["Rubil Ivica" <irubil@eizg.hr>]

Fabrizio,

why don't you first estimate the lambda separately and just use it as an additional covariate in -oaxaca-?

ir

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Fabrizio Colella - 1348010
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:43 PM
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: st: Oxaca decomposition with heckman

Dear Statalist,

I would like to perform an Oaxaca-Blinder Wage Decomposition comparing hourly wage of part-time and full-time employees. 

Moreover, I want to perform an Heckman model with a selection regarding the choices of workers among part-time, full-time and non-employment at the first step.

It seems it is impossible to achieve my goal using directly the command "Oaxaca" because the dependent variable at the first stage of the Heckman model is the same I have entered in the section "by(...)" of the Oaxaca structure. 
Any suggestions?

Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thanks
Fabrizio


------------------------------------------

Fabrizio Colella
Bocconi University and
Fondazione Rodolfo DeBenedetti
Milan, Italy
fabrizio.colella@studbocconi.it
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/