Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Omitted category interaction variables


From   Estrella Gomez <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Omitted category interaction variables
Date   Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:18:33 +0100

Yes, but this is not what I want. Then it excludes the year 2006  in
the last set of dummies; i.year; but I want it to be excluded from
every interaction term (i.year#c.ldist; i.year#i.dhome and
i.year#i.dlang)

2013/11/4 Maarten Buis <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Estrella Gomez wrote:
>> I'm regressing an equation where three variables are interacted with
>> years. I would like to have 2006 as base year; that's it, I want Stata
>> to omit this year in all cases. I use the command:
>>
>> xtreg lpq b2006i.year#c.ldist b2006i.year#i.dhome b2006i.year#i.dlang i.year, fe
>>
>> but it does not work; Stata omit a different year in each case.
>
> Did you try:
> xtreg lpq i.year#c.ldist i.year#i.dhome i.year#i.dlang ib2006.year, fe
>
> Hope this helps,
> Maarten
>
> ---------------------------------
> Maarten L. Buis
> WZB
> Reichpietschufer 50
> 10785 Berlin
> Germany
>
> http://www.maartenbuis.nl
> ---------------------------------
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index