Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: understanding ml (and its failure)
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: understanding ml (and its failure)
Date
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:34:49 +0100
I stop at reading that you have variables B1 and B2 which are in
practice constants. A constant can have no relationship with a
response and thus no predictive value. Regardless of how you view such
variables substantively or theoretically there is no point in trying
to use such variables in a model.
By the way, please honour the request to use full real names on Statalist.
Nick
[email protected]
On 10 October 2013 17:26, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalisters,
> I am trying to understand a do file where the underlying data has the variables B1 and B2 which are both equal to 0 for all observations. After the programm -mlblub- is defined, it is used in the -ml- framework in the following way: -ml model lf mlblub (A1: B1=one, nocons) (A2: B2=one, nocons), maximize search(off) difficult trace init(2 1, copy) technique(dfp)-
> I have two directly related questions.
> 1. What is the function of the B1=one and B2=one terms in the equation?
> 2. If I run the the -ml- line I get the error message "initial values not feasible" r(1400). Is that because of the 0 values in B1 and B2?
> Best,
> Darjusch
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/