Re: st: Graph format for publication with Springer

[Christopher Baum <kit.baum@bc.edu>]

<>
On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:33 AM, statalist-digest Jacob wrote:

> On the other hand, the .tifs look good and are much clearer in the 
> version I created vs the version sent to us by Springer.
> 
> Have any of you had experience with Springer, or have any general tips 
> as to how we can get graphs that appear more clearly? Is it just a 
> matter of sending them the graphs as .eps? Is there additional 
> information you need to answer my question?

I have no first-hand experience with what Springer wants to see, but Stata Press accepts .eps as the highest-quality alternative in graph export. Saying that something looks good in MS Word is not likely to have any relation to professional publishing. I would export all graphs as .eps; I have no problem viewing those when included in a LaTeX manuscript on my system, and they have excellent resolution, as in the books listed below.

Kit

Kit Baum   |   Boston College Economics & DIW Berlin   |   http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
                             An Introduction to Stata Programming  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/isp.html
  An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata  |   http://www.stata-press.com/books/imeus.html




*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/