Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Is it normal for some propensity scores to be missing?


From   Lukas Borkowski <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Is it normal for some propensity scores to be missing?
Date   Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:15:09 +0200

Keat,

have you made sure that none of the values of your x variables or your event variable are missing?
You can try -egen miss=rowmiss(event x1 x2 x3 x4 x5)- to crosscheck that!

Best

#
Lukas Borkowski
University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS)

M: [email protected]



On 13.08.2013, at 09:52, Ricky Lim <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone!
> 
> I am new to propensity score matching.
> I ran it on STATA with the command
> "pscore event x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, pscore(myscore) blockid(myblock) comsup"
> with a set of hospital data - to get the pscore for hospital "event".
> 
> However, I realise STATA did not produce pscore for some of the hospitals,
> and seems like all of them also do not have block ID with common support = 0.
> 
> And if I run it without common support, their block ID will appear as 0.
> 
> I wonder why is this the case.
> Does this mean that I will not be able use those without propensity
> score as my counter factual?
> 
> Hope some of you will be able to give some advices.
> Thank you very much in advanced!
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Keat
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index