Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: RE: RE: OLS equivalence for unbalanced panel


From   Silviya Nikolova <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   st: RE: RE: OLS equivalence for unbalanced panel
Date   Fri, 5 Jul 2013 00:07:33 +0000

Thanks! It works.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schaffer, Mark E
Sent: 04 July 2013 19:36
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: RE: OLS equivalence for unbalanced panel

Silviya,

This can happen in finite samples with the 2-step RE estimator.  You can try using different methods for estimating the variance components - either the -sa- option (which uses the Swamy-Aurora method) or the -mle- option - to see if it makes a difference.

HTH,
Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner- 
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Silviya Nikolova
> Sent: 04 July 2013 18:10
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: OLS equivalence for unbalanced panel
> 
> Dear Statalist,
> 
> I am estimating RE model (xtreg) using unbalanced panel dataset. 
> Sigma_u for some reason is 0. My dependent variable is discrete with 
> large variation. To understand why this is the case, I tried:
> 1. Add some iid normal noise to the data 2. Drop groups with small 
> number of observations in them These two approaches do not make a 
> difference.
> 3. Reduce the number of variables (after sufficient number of dropped 
> variables sigma_u became > 0).
> 4. Expand the data using --expand 2-- command. This generates non-zero 
> sigma_u as well.
> Is there any reasonable explanation for all 4 of these? 2 and 3 in 
> isolation can be explained easily.
> 
> This is a snippet of the output before expand:
> 
> . xtreg q2_OHS ISTC q1_OHS ${q1_eq5d_elem_nf} q1_eq5d_health_scale 
> ${other_health_nf} ${comorbs_nf} ${pa
> > tients_nf_`severity'} ${provider_nf}, re
> 
> Random-effects GLS regression                   Number of obs      =     
> 36090 Group variable: procode1                        Number of groups   
> =       246
> 
> R-sq:  within  = 0.2200                         Obs per group: min =         
> 1
>        between = 0.6405                                        avg =     
> 146.7
>        overall = 0.2415                                        max =      
> 1017
> 
>                                                 Wald chi2(45)      =  
> 11473.56 corr(u_i, X)   = 0 (assumed)                    Prob > chi2        
> =    0.0000
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> 
> . . .
> 
> ---------------------+------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------+----------------
>              sigma_u |          0
>              sigma_e |  8.2124003
>                  rho |          0   (fraction of variance due to u_i)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> 
> 
> 
> And after expand:
> 
> . preserve
> 
> . expand 2
> (133799 observations created)
> 
> . xtset procode1
> 
> . xtreg q2_OHS ISTC q1_OHS ${q1_eq5d_elem_nf} q1_eq5d_health_scale 
> ${other_health_nf} ${comorbs_nf} ${pa
> 
> > tients_nf_`severity'} ${provider_nf}, re
> 
> Random-effects GLS regression                   Number of obs      =     
> 72180 Group variable: procode1                        Number of groups   
> =       246
> 
> R-sq:  within  = 0.2200                         Obs per group: min =         
> 2
>        between = 0.6400                                        avg =     
> 293.4
>        overall = 0.2409                                        max =      
> 2034
> 
>                                                 Wald chi2(45)      =  
> 20798.64 corr(u_i, X)   = 0 (assumed)                    Prob > chi2        
> =    0.0000
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> 
> . . .
> 
> ---------------------+------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------+----------------
>              sigma_u |   1.115697
>              sigma_e |  8.1965088
>                  rho |  .01819121   (fraction of variance due to u_i)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> 
> . restore
> 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Silviya
> 
> 
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


-----
Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2011-2013 Top in the UK for student experience Fourth university in the UK and top in Scotland (National Student Survey 2012)

We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes. 
Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how to apply.

Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under charity number SC000278.


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index