Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: -gllamm- vs -meglm-


From   Daniel Waxman <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: -gllamm- vs -meglm-
Date   Tue, 2 Jul 2013 19:11:39 -0700

containing such large groups..."

3,000 observations in a group isn't what it used to be!  There are
many of us who routinely work with gigabytes of data, and it would be
helpful if Stata's documentation made it clear from the outset that
some estimation routines are not meant for us, if they are not.

Somehow SAS's glimmix routine is able to fit at least single random
intercept logistic models on huge datasets relatively quickly (and it
does so while using very little memory).    To the extent that the
Stata development team is willing to comment on a competing product,
I'd be interested on their take on whether Stata will be able to do
the same any time soon.

Thanks!
Dan
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index