Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Re: coefficient explanation


From   "Joseph Coveney" <stajc2@gmail.com>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   Re: st: Re: coefficient explanation
Date   Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:17:12 +0900

Kayla Bridge wrote:

Thanks a lot, Joseph and John.

But I searched the previous emails, I did not find the post by Maarten Buis.
Could you please send me the post? I appreciate.

----------------------------------------

Well, you could start here (
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2013-03/msg00305.html  ) for a recent
thread, and here ( http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-07/msg00584.html
) for an older one.

But threads concerning endogeneity, omitted variables, mediation and so on pop
up on this list every now and then, and the threads have many participants.  I
wasn't intending to neglect contributions from other list members. 

John Antonakis posted on this thread after I did, and I thought that the
references he cited in his post (including the podcast lecture) covered your
questions well.

Joseph Coveney

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index