Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Suryadipta Roy <sroy2138@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model |

Date |
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:06:18 -0400 |

Dear David, I have used both log linear model (that apply only to country pairs with nonzero bilateral imports) as well as fixed effects Poisson to include the zero observations (based on some wonderful suggestions from Bill Gould in Statablog here http://blog.stata.com/2011/08/22/use-poisson-rather-than-regress-tell-a-friend/). Earlier, Dimitriy had suggested an intuitive interpretation of the coefficient terms in terms of semi-elasticity, and I can probably persist with that interpretation for Poisson regression. Best regards, Suryadipta. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:57 PM, David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Suryadipta, > > Thank you for Stata Tip #87. As Maarten explains in the last > paragraph, the approach applies to all forms of multiplicative > effects. For your continuous dependent variable, you could work out > interpretations along the lines of the odds ratios and odds in his > example. They would not, however, involve odds ratios (or > incidence-rate ratios or hazard ratios). > > I don't recall that your earlier messages mentioned the many zeros. > Your analysis should take that feature of the data into account. > Perhaps the model should apply only to pairs of countries that have > nonzero bilateral imports. > > Regards, > > David Hoaglin > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Suryadipta Roy <sroy2138@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear David, >> The dependent variable in my regression is indeed a continuous >> variable, highly skewed with a lot of zeros (bilateral imports between >> countries). I will refrain from using an odds ratio interpretation as >> you have suggested. Here is a link to Maarten's Stata tip # 87: >> http://www.maartenbuis.nl/publications/interactions.pdf >> >> Best regards, >> Suryadipta. > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

**References**:**st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*Suryadipta Roy <sroy2138@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*Suryadipta Roy <sroy2138@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*Suryadipta Roy <sroy2138@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*Suryadipta Roy <sroy2138@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model***From:*David Hoaglin <dchoaglin@gmail.com>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: Re: Request code simplification** - Next by Date:
**st: Test for significance of total effects in a system of simultaneous equations** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Interpretation of interaction term in log linear (non linear) model** - Index(es):