Bookmark and Share

Notice: On March 31, it was announced that Statalist is moving from an email list to a forum. The old list will shut down at the end of May, and its replacement, statalist.org is already up and running.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: nlogit


From   Chiara Mussida <cmussida@gmail.com>
To   statalist <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   st: nlogit
Date   Sun, 26 May 2013 11:56:58 +0200

Dear All,
I run a nlogit with a degenerate branch: the commands typed are:

nlogitgen noemp=dataset(no:1, yes: 2|3|4)
constraint 1 [no_tau]_cons=1
nlogit mode EE || noemp:  classe1 classe2  classe4 || dataset:,
noconstant case(id)  constraint(1)

details: noemp is a variable for individuals leaving the state of
employment for: a different job (working time, sector, employer, job
position), for unemployment, and for inactivity (yes:2,3,4). the
degenerate branch is for individual not leaving employment/not
changing their empl conditions (no:1).

I then fix my constraint as required for the degenerate branch.
The problem is in the model specification, precisely for the first
equation (mode is the dependent variable, correctly specified): i'm
not able to find an alternative specific variable with a within case
variability. I tried with the stock at the beginning of the period of
the individuals not leaving employment (EE above), firmsize, age,
gender but without success. Do you have suggestions?

Thanks
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2014 StataCorp LP   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index